TTIP and TPP: Trade Pacts in Trouble

Under the radar of the big news items, fueled by the migration and Russia crises, populism and the threat of Brexit, terrorism and (once again) the Eurocrisis, another issue is emerging: trade. Now while this seems pretty boring, tens of thousand ds of people assemble on squares in Europe to protest against the TTIP, the planned trade agreement between the USA and the EU, and its sibling, the TPP, the related treaty between the U.S. and ASEAN countries, also suffers from a mixed reputation. All current U.S. presidential candidates have positioned themselves more or less against these trade agreements.

And indeed, there is data that suggests previous trade agreements have cost industrial workers in America jobs. On the other hand, David Ricardo would argue even today that nothing better may happen to a country then healthy trade relations. As well, these deals have geopolitical benefits, serving as a way of tightening links between the US and EU in the case of the TTIP, and the US and its ASEAN partners with the TPP. Nonetheless, there are two major issues turning people against these negotiations: first, that there are useful or ‘just’ standards that would have to be reduced for assuring consensus among signatories; and second, that there is an inbuilt trend away from national legislation, towards arbitration in the case of conflicts.

Now how do we, the experts, assess these two treaties? Should they be finalized soon, before there will be a new U.S. administration, or does it pay off to let the talk linger indefinitely?

– Prof. Dr. Klaus Segbers

Summary
TTIP and TPP: Trade Pacts in Trouble
Article Name
TTIP and TPP: Trade Pacts in Trouble
Description
Under the radar of the big news items, fueled by the migration and Russia crises, populism and the threat of Brexit, terrorism and (once again) the Eurocrisis, another issue is emerging: trade.
Author
, , , , ,
  1. Alexei Voskressenski 1 year ago

    Difficulties are political, and the understanding of these difficulties is always short sighted and parochial. It is clear that the new level of competition will be among macro-regional blocks that may establish transregional ties between them. From my point of view this is our next future, and I wrote a forthcoming book to explain it.

    Share >
  2. Justas Paleckis 1 year ago

    No-one has yet seen the draft TTIP agreement except the experts working on it and a very narrow circle of politicians. This is already causing suspicion to millions of people on both sides of the Atlantic. Their negativity towards the TTIP reflects also their sceptical views of the political elite of the EU and the US who supports this project.
    Brussels is trying to convince people that the treaty is mutually beneficial and will create new jobs and raise the GDP of each EU country. Supposedly, laws and standards would be valid as before. The disagreements would be settled in the arbitral commission made of representatives from both sides.
    Obama, heroically fighting for this agreement, is quite popular in the US and the EU and likely more popular than his successor. So maybe one could trust him and hope that the TTIP agreement will be finalized this year. However, an avalanche of crises and bad news which fell upon the world in recent years already disaccustomed us to good news.

    Share >
  3. Caroline King 1 year ago

    There is legitimate concern about the process and the aspects of the content, which took negotiators by surprise. In the past there has been little public interest in how these trade deals are managed – with some famous exceptions – eg NAFTA.

    But German public debate around trade is coloured – and distorted – by other concerns: with the state of the EU, with globalization, with technology and data privacy. These issues are clouding the agenda and make it difficult to conduct an objective discussion. Nonetheless, the goals of freer trade are broadly accepted and welcome.
    In general, and if they work well, trade agreements are about reducing trade barriers, finding alignment in international standards among like-minded partners and creating more trade for more jobs. Trade negotiators learned a lot from the public debate and that is good. It would be good to agree on a document and move forward – before others set the standards for us.

    Share >

2 Comments

  1. Tom Owens 1 year ago

    America, particularly right-wing politicians, seem to be under the impression that somewhere within its borders are legions of unemployed factory workers ready to bring industrialization back to 1950s levels. Unfortunately, the reality is that many industries that brought the United States economic prosperity are no longer viable in a modern economy – and many of America’s young people have turned away from the occupations of their parents and grandparents. Quelling world trade with nostalgia of the early 20th century is counter-productive for the world’s economy. Instead, America should spend its energy finding new niches, and keep in mind that they may look very different from the automotive factories of yesteryear.

    ReplyShare >
  2. AW 1 year ago

    Even though TTIP is objectively a good thing to do and would really make it possible for Europe and the US to set international trade standards, the project has such a bad reputation, that I can hardly imagine anything, that could fix it now. It would be a suicide for any democratically elected government in Europe to sign it – especially because nobody really knows its content. The stupid negotiation strategy of excluding the population and even MPs from the talks and making content top-sicret made signing this document any time soon absolutely impossible.

    ReplyShare >

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available