Between Freedom and Security: How Can We Deal With Terrorism?

Surveillance camera in cosmopolitan city

Apparently, this is the new normal: two terrorist attacks on one day (London and Brussels), the day before another attack in London and  a week earlier —  London again. In between and not long before the world witnessed attacks in France and Germany, with more terrorist attacks happening in Russia, let alone Afghanistan and other MENA countries.

Western societies were exposed to domestic terrorism in the 1970s. But since that time, terror attacks seemed to be something that happened in faraway places — until 9/11 sent home a clear message: it can (and will) happen any place, any time. And after the carnage in Charlie Hebdo’s office in Paris, in January of 2015, it looks as if terrorist attacks, mostly committed by Muslim-related perpetrators, have become routine. Citizens have developed new ways of screening their environments, knowing that this can produce little more than a symbolic action.

While governments started to increase funding for police and intelligence operations, and CCTV cameras have proliferated, citizens seem to have become more fatalistic, continuing with their usual liberal lifestyles under the pressure ofincreased nervousness.

Is there anything liberal societies can do about this except adapt to new threat levels?

– Klaus Segbers

, , , , ,
  1. Justas Paleckis 43 mins ago

    The number of people killed by the hands of terrorists is ridiculously small compared to the number of road crash deaths. Today we accept the risk of death on roads as inevitable. Tomorrow, probably, we will similarly assess the risk of being killed due to explosion on the ground, in the air or in the water, due to gunshots or due to a car which is driven into crowd. These are the wages for our civilization’s generosity to the “golden billion”, while forgetting other seven billions, for the inability of mankind to eliminate wars and bloody conflicts. So, we will live in the routine atmosphere of increased nervousness. So, increased funding for police and intelligence will delay the time when the victims killed by terrorist attacks will outnumber the road crash deaths.

    Share >
  2. Alexei Voskressenski 38 mins ago

    Do we really believe that the state, even with a liberal society, cannot do anything against international terrorism? If the answer is yes, than societies need only to adapt to a new reality with new threat levels. However, if the state’s special mechanism is dead to the extent of not being able to rebuff terrorism than what to do in case of war? Did states dismantle their war machines? No. And we are explained that the state’s war machines are ready to rebuff any threat. However, if states are ready to rebuff external threats, than why another militarized part of the state is not ready to answer the threat of terrorism? Police and special forces have no money for that? They are not prepared? If they are asked, they disagree to that. Terrorism strikes because societies are liberal? I do not believe that. States are unable to rebuff international terrorism because there is no coordination and no trust between special services, and because there is not enough political will to coordinate their efforts. The world is in a disbalance and discoordination and states are unable to coordinate their efforts because of that. Before the attack in Boston, Russian FSB notified American FBI of such a possibility, but no one believed and listened. And there are other examples. It is worth thinking about it.

    Share >


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Saying Goodbye to American Hegemony – What’s next?

The role of the US in the international system is under construction. Since President Trump, the US has taken a step back from their commitment to NATO, announced to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement and voiced the intent to renegotiate NAFTA. But even before Trump, the era of American hegemony has begun wavering. With the US resigning as leader of the so-called free world, new spaces open up for other actors to redefine their roles.

Academic Freedom Under Threat – Where do we go from here?

Academic freedom is at the heart of a pluralist society. Yet lately, this cornerstone of democracy has increasingly come under threat. What actions can and need to be taken to safeguard universities as bastions of free thought and sources of innovation?

Beyond Macron – Can we make liberal democracy great again?

These days, nothing seems like it used to be. Centrist independent Emmanuel Macron has decisively won the presidential election, but is this already the end of the story? Marine Le Pen’s defeat by a 66% to 34% margin still marks a historically high level of support for France’s far right. This mirrors how right wing populism has become a legitimate political position in only a short year — and across the globe.

To trade or not to trade?

In the past, most people would have agreed that international trade is a win-win situation. By 2017, however, trade has become one of the most heated issues in politics.

Diplomatic crisis – How to deal with Turkey?

The current crisis in EU-Turkey relations is the latest upheaval in a series of events marking President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s drive for more power. Against the backdrop of the upcoming 16 April referendum, the question arises as for how the international community should react – or not.